<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>World History, Macrohistory</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2008/07/20#world-history</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;Where &quot;macrohistory&quot; begins and ordinary history leaves off, I shan't
attempt to say.  Nor shall I attempt to draw a very precise border with
&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;sociology&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Mitch Porter, in correspondence, quotes the following definition of &quot;world
history&quot; from S. A. M. Adshead's &lt;cite&gt;Central Asia in World History&lt;/cite&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
What was to end the ages of isolation [i.e. of &quot;tangential and irregular
contact&quot; between &quot;the four primary civilizations of Western Eurasia, East Asia,
Black Africa, and Meso-America&quot;] was the development of a global overlay, an
interlocking set of institutions, which made the world less many and more one.
It is these institutions, or world networks as they may be called, which form
the subject matter of world history, as it will be understood in this study.
World history, in this sense, is not super-history. Indeed, especially in its
earlier stages, it is somewhat marginal history.  It is simply the history of
rather pervasive institutions or networks which operate, if not in all four
primary civilizations, at least in more than one of them.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now, clearly the history of those pervasive institutions and networks is very
interesting and important, and equally clearly &quot;world history&quot; is a natural
name for that subject.  (I'm skeptical of the idea of discrete civilizations,
but another time.)  If we were engaged in the rectification of names, that
might well be the end of it, but as it happens &quot;world history&quot; is already used
for a somewhat ill-defined subject, of which networks and institutions of
global reach is but a part.  World history, in the ordinary sense, is roughly
supposed to be the history of events of global importance.  This is, naturally,
a superset of Adshead's &quot;world history&quot;, and perhaps even a natural one, since
one wants to say that (e.g.) the French Revolution was an event of global
importance, though it was not part of those world institutions.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Cf.
	&lt;a href=&quot;archaeology.html&quot;&gt;Archaeology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;historical-materialism.html&quot;&gt;Historical Materialism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;history.html&quot;&gt;History and Historiography&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;plagues.html&quot;&gt;Plagues&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Janet Abu-Lughod, &lt;cite&gt;Before European Hegemony: The World System
A.D. 1250--1350&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;S. A. M. Adshead, &lt;cite&gt;Central Asia in World History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Guillermo Algaze, &quot;The Sumerian
Takeoff&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol1/iss1/art2/&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Structure
and Dynamics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;1:1&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 2&lt;/a&gt; [From the abstract:
&quot;Economic geographers correctly note that regional variations in economic
activity and population agglomeration are always the result of self-reinforcing
processes of resource production, accumulation, exchange, and innovation.  This
article proposes that essentially similar forces account for the emergence of
the world's earliest cities in the alluvial lowlands of the Tigris and
Euphrates rivers (Souther Mesopotamia), sometime during the second half of the
fourth millennium BC.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Manuel DeLanda, &lt;cite&gt;A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jared Diamond, &lt;cite&gt;Guns, Germs and Steel&lt;/cite&gt; [The only
genuinely scientific approach to history I've ever seen.  Brilliant and utterly
convincing.  The big picture of all human societies over the last 13,000 years
or so.]
	&lt;li&gt;Mark Elvin
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Pattern of the Chinese Past&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Why China Failed to Create an Endogenous Industrial
Capitalism: A Critique of Max Weber's
Explanation&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0304-2421%28198405%2913%3A3%3C379%3AWCFTCA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Theory
and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;13&lt;/strong&gt; (1984): 370--391&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;[A]n economic and
ecological explanation of China's failure to create her own industrial
capitalism is possible, and that it is simpler in its assumptions, more
internally consistent, and more amenable to empirical verification than the
cultural and ideological analysis offered by Weber.  Where political or
cultural factors are important, they are not linked to characteristic Weberian
themes, such as inner-worldly asceticism.  Examples are China's lack of a
modern science, her failure to persist in long-distance overseas exploration
and trade, and her substitution of commercial-type relationships for direct
management in much industrial organization.  Furthermore, [this] approach
[explains] the differential response in modern times of different parts of the
Chinese culture-area to the challenge of imitative modern economic growth,
while the Weberian approach [does] not... [L]ate-traditional Chinese values and
ideas were in most respects already suitable for modern economic growth, and
... the key inhibiting constraints were not cultural.&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;gellner.html&quot;&gt;Ernest Gellner&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Plow, Sword and
Book: The Structure of Human History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Larry Gonick, &lt;cite&gt;The Cartoon History of the Universe&lt;/cite&gt; [I'm
serious; the information is accurate, the coverage is global, the jokes are
funny, and the drawing is good.]
	&lt;li&gt;Eric Hobsbawm [The first three are his trilogy on the &quot;long
nineteenth century&quot;; the last, the &quot;short twentieth century&quot;]
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Age of Revolution&lt;/citE&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Age of Capital&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Age of Imperialism&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Age of Extremes: A History of the World,
1917--1991&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Marshall Hodgson
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Venture of Islam&lt;/cite&gt; [Essentially a
fragment of his never-finished world history]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam,
and World History&lt;/cite&gt; [Ed. Edmund Burke III]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jay Levenson (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Circa 1492: Art in the Age of
Exploration&lt;/cite&gt; [Visually lovely and highly scholarly survey of world art,
and so the world's high cultures, circa 1492, i.e., around the climax of the
agrarian age.]
	&lt;li&gt;Martin W. Lewis and K&amp;auml;ren E. Wigen, &lt;cite&gt;The Myth of
Continents: A Critique of Metageography&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. R. McNeill and William H. McNeill, &lt;cite&gt;The Human Web: A
Bird's-Eye View of World History&lt;/cite&gt; [The
&lt;a href=&quot;complex-networks.html&quot;&gt;reticular&lt;/a&gt; interpretation of history]
	&lt;li&gt;William H. McNeill
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Global Condition: Conquerors, Catastrophes
and Community&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Plagues and Peoples&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force and
Society since A.D. 1000&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Rise of the West&lt;/citE&gt; [&lt;em&gt;Not&lt;/em&gt;
Eurocentric, despite the title]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kenneth Pomeranz, &lt;cite&gt;The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and
the Making of the Modern World Economy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kenneth Pomeranz and Steven Topik, &lt;cite&gt;The World that Trade
Created: Society, Culture, and the World Economy, 1400 to the Present&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kim Stanley Robinson, &lt;cite&gt;The Years of Rice and Salt&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;em&gt;The&lt;/em&gt; novel of global history.  So what if it's not the history of
&lt;em&gt;our&lt;/em&gt; globe?]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Wright, &lt;citE&gt;Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny&lt;/cite&gt;
[The last third, about the meaning of life, must be massively discounted; the
first two-thirds are very good.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;S. A. M. Adshead, &lt;cite&gt;China in World History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas T. Allsen, &lt;cite&gt;The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upenn.edu/pennpress/book/14223.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Braudel, &lt;cite&gt;The Mediterranean&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;K. N. Chaudhuri, &lt;citE&gt;Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean:
An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Christian, &lt;cite&gt;Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big
History&lt;/cite&gt; [From the Big Bang to the present in 664 pages. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9249.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]]
	&lt;li&gt;Randall Collins, &lt;citE&gt;Macrosociology: Essays on the Sociology of
the Long Run&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alfred W. Crosby, &lt;cite&gt;Children of the Sun: A History of
Humanity's Unappeaseable Appetite for Energy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mike Davis, &lt;cite&gt;Late Victorian Holocausts: El Nino Famines and
the Making of the Third World&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Philip De Souza, &lt;citE&gt;Seafaring and Civilization: Maritime
Perspectives on World History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Drews, &lt;cite&gt;The End of the Bronze Age&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jack Goody
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The East in the West&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of
the Domestic Domain&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridge.org/0521290880&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Johan Goudsblom, Eric Jones and Stephen Mennell, &lt;cite&gt;The Course
of Human History: Economic Growth, Social Process, and Civilization&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mary S. Hartman, &lt;cite&gt;The Household and the Making of
History: A Subversive View of the Western Past&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521536691&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;John M. Hobson, &lt;cite&gt;The Eastern Origins of Western
Civilisation&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521547245&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Eric Jones
		 &lt;ul&gt;
		 &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The European Miracle&lt;/cite&gt;
		 &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Growth Recurring&lt;/cite&gt;
		 &lt;/ul&gt;
totalitarianism.html
	&lt;li&gt;John Keay, &lt;cite&gt;The Spice Route: A History&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/10668.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Philiip L. Kohl, &lt;cite&gt;The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/052184780X&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Mann, &lt;cite&gt;The Sources of Social Power&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Patrick Manning, &lt;cite&gt;Navigating World History: Historians
Create a Global Past&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sidney W. Mintz, &lt;cite&gt;Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar
in Modern History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Mithen, &lt;citE&gt;After the Ice: A Global Human History,
20,000-5,000 BC&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookReviewTypeDetail/assetid/42352&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt;
in &lt;cite&gt;American Scientist&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Daivd Northrup, &lt;cite&gt;Africa's Discovery of Europe,
1450--1850&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Colin Renfrew and J. F. Cherry (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Peer Polity
Interaction and Socio-political Change&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John F. Richards, &lt;cite&gt;The Unending Frontier: An Environmental
History of the Early Modern World&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9482.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Nathan Rosenberg, &lt;cite&gt;How the West Grew Rich: The Economic
Transformation of the Industrial World&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Lord Smail, &lt;cite&gt;On Deep History and the Brain&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/10764.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Adam T. Smith, &lt;cite&gt;The Political Landscape: Constellations of
Authority in Early Complex Polities&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9963.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;J. K. J. Thomson, &lt;cite&gt;Decline in History: The European
Experience&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bruce Trigger, &lt;cite&gt;Understanding Early Civilizations: A
Comparative Study&lt;/cite&gt; [Bookseller's description: &quot;The first detailed
comparative study of the seven most fully documented early civilizations:
ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, Shang China, the Aztecs and their neighbors, the
Classic Maya, the Inka, and the Yoruba. Unlike previous studies, equal
attention is paid to similarities and differences in their sociopolitical
organization, their economic systems, and their religious beliefs, knowledge,
art, and values.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;David Wilkinson, &quot;Civilizations as Networks: Trade, War, Diplomacy,
and Command-Control&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;10.1002/cplx.10049&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Complexity&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt; (2002):
82--86&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John E. Wills, &lt;cite&gt;1688: A Global History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>