Religion
21 Sep 2023 09:39
I'm particularly interested in what one might call, with a nod towards Mr. Hume, the natural history of religion --- religion considered as an utterly mundane, human phenomenon, something invoking various mental and social processes, much like book-collecting, politics or protection rackets, all of which, in some ways, resemble it. The basic observations about the natural histories of religion would seem to be that (1) religion is nearly but not quite universal among human beings; (2) religions are not believed because they are true; (3) every religion is full of wishful thinking, and the more popular the strain, the more wishful it is, and the more anthropomorphic. (A brief explanation of (2): at most one religion can be correct. Therefore most of them cannot be believed because they are true, because they are not. But even if we suppose that one of the existing faiths is true, it is manifestly propagated by exactly the same mechanisms as all the false ones, so its truth is not the reason it is adhered to.)
- See also:
- Cognitive Science
- Conversion
- Cults
- Mircea Eliade
- Goddess, The
- Import of Eastern religions to Europe
- Initiation Rites
- Islam
- Magic
- Memes
- Millenarianism
- Myths
- Possession
- Psychoceramics
- Role-Playing Games
- Shamanism
- Social Neuroscience
- Sociology
- Superstition
- Terrorism
- Zen
- Recommended:
- Scott Atran, In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion [But he seems to me to be wrong about religions being necessary to wide-spread social trust]
- Justin L. Barrett, "Exploring the natural foundations of religion", Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000): 29--34
- Pascal Boyer,
- Tradition as Truth and Communication: A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse
- "Why Is Religion Natural?", Skeptical Inquirer (May 2004) [Online; popular summary of ch. 1 of his book on the explanation of religion, listed below because I haven't finished it]
- Steven Cassedy, What Do We Mean When We Talk about Meaning?
- Ernest Gellner, "Flux and Reflux in the Faiths of Men" in his Muslim Society
- John B. Henderson, The Construction of Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: Neo-Confucian, Islamic, Jewish, and Early Christian Patterns
- David Hume
- The Natural History of Religion
- Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
- "Of Superstition and Enthusiasm"
- Marshall G. S. Hodgson, The Venture of Islam [Has many excellent observations on the history of religions (natural and otherwise) which extend far beyond Islam]
- William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience
- W. G. Runciman, "The Diffusion of Christianity in the Third Century AD as a Case-Study in the Theory of Cultural Selection", European Journal of Sociology 45 (2004): 3--21 [For more on Runciman's theory of cultural selection, see here.]
- To read:
- Timothy Beal, Religion and Its Monsters
- Maurice Bloch, Prey into Hunter: The Politics of Religious Experience
- Pascal Boyer
- The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion
- Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought
- Jenny-Ann Brodin, "A Matter of Choice: A Micro-Level Study on how Swedish New Agers Choose their Religious Beliefs and Practices", Rationality and Society 15 (2003): 381--405
- Steve Bruce, God Is Dead: Secularization in the West
- David Clingingsmith, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Michael Kremer, "Estimating the Impact of The Hajj: Religion and Tolerance in Islam's Global Gathering", Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2009): 1133--1170
- Anna Collar, Religious Networks in the Roman Empire: The Spread of New Ideas
- Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt, A Natural History of Natural Theology: The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion [Review in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews; JSTOR version of the book]
- William R. Drees, Religion, Science and Naturalism
- Emile Durkheim, Elementary Forms of Religions Life [This notion that rituals instill concepts seems incredibly wrong-headed to me, if only because participating in a ritual demands a fair bit of cognitive, conceptual machinery. So it'll be just as well to get the idea from the original source. I've got some links to critical literature in Thought and Society.]
- Mircea Eliade
- Patterns of Comparative Religioon
- A History of Religious Ideas [3 vols.]
- Richard K. Fenn, Beyond Idols: The Shape of a Secular Society
- Emilio Gentile, The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy
- S. E. Guthrie, Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion
- Ashley Harrell, "Do religious cognitions promote prosociality?", Rationality and Society 24 (2012): 463--482
- Daniele Hervieu-Leger, Religion as a Chain of Memory
- Caroline Humphrey and James Laidlaw, The Archetypal Actions of Ritual ["What happens in religious traditions when the nature of the ritual is questioned, but the practice of performing rituals is not itself abandoned? How is it that people can accomplish ritual successfully without belief, and even without attributing any meaning to it? This book draws on the authors' observations of such reactions among Jains in western India, and asks what they can tell us about ritual as a mode of human action. Most anthropologists have assumed that ritual is a special kind of happening. The authors argue that we should not define ritual as a distinct type of event but instead look at ritualization, which is a modification of action. What is distinctive about actions which are ritualized? This book proposes a new theory to analyse the qualities which ritualization gives to a wide and disparate range of actions and events. The authors reject the common view that ritual carries intrinsic meaning, and stress the reasons why participants may or may not give meaning to ritual acts. They draw on insights from the philosophy of action, cognitive psychology, and phenomenology, to explore the paradox that in ritual, actors both are and are not the authors of their acts. The book explores the implications for anthropology of this new theory of ritual, with discussions of the relation between texts and action, the importance of bodily experience in ritual enactment, and the sense of selfhood as it is affected by ritual."]
- James W. Laine, Meta-Religion: Religion and Power in World History
- E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley, Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture
- Gabriel Levy, Beyond Heaven and Earth: A Cognitive Theory of Religion
- I. M. Lewis, Religion in Context: Cults and Charisma
- Brian Malley, How the Bible Works: An Anthropological Study of Evangelical Biblicism
- Robert N. McCauley, Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not
- Robert N. McCauley and E. Thomas Lawson, Bringing Ritual to Mind
- Ara Norenzayan and Azim F. Shariff, "The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality", Science 332 (2008): 58--62
- Martin Riesebrodt, The Promise of Salvation: A Theory of Religion
- Ann Taves, Revelatory Events: Three Case Studies of the Emergence of New Spiritual Paths
- Todd Tremlin, Minds and Gods: The Cognitive Foundations of Religion
- Yi-Fu Tuan, Religion: From Place to Placelessness
- Marshall Sahlins with Frederick B. Henry, The New Science of the Enchanted Universe: An Anthropology of Most of Humanity
- D. Jason Slone, Theological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn't
- Harvey Whitehouse
- Arguments and Icons: Divergent Modes of Religiosity
- Inside the Cult: Religious Innovation and Transmission in Papua New Guinea ["For the past thirty years, adherents of the millenarian cult of the Pomio Kivung in Papua New Guinea have been awaiting the establishment of a period of supernatural bliss, heralded by the return of their ancestors bearing 'cargo'. The author of this book, Harvey Whitehouse, was taken for a reincarnated ancestor, and was thus able to observe the dynamics of the cult from within. From the stable mainstream of the cult, localized splinter groups periodically emerge, hoping to expedite the millennium; the core of this volume concerns the close study of one such group in two Baining villages. The two aspects of the cult studied here - on the one hand a large, uniform, and stable mainstream organization with a well-defined hierarchy demanding orthodoxy of views, and on the other hand a small-scale and temporary movement, emotional and innovative in its views - stand in sharp contrast one to the other, but are here seen as divergent modes of the same process, implemented in differing ways. This original theory of 'modes of religiosity' which Whitehouse here develops draws on recent findings in cognitive psychology to link styles of codification and cultural transmission to the political scale, structure, and ethos of religious communities."]
- The Ritual Animal: Imitation and Cohesion in the Evolution of Social Complexity