How Much of the Behavior of the South African Proletariat Can Sociobiology Explain?
More than zero but less than a third.
- Sam Bowles and Dori Posel,
"Genetic Relatedness predicts South African migrant workers' remittances to
their families", Nature 434 (2005): 380--383 [Journal link]
- Abstract: Inclusive fitness models predict many commonly observed
behaviours: among humans, studies of within-household violence, the allocation
of food and child care find that people favour those to whom they are more
closely related. In some cases however, kin-altruism effects appear to be
modest. Do individuals favour kin to the extent that kin-altruism models
predict? Data on remittances sent by South African migrant workers to their
rural households of origin allow an explicit test, to our knowledge the first
of its kind for humans. Using estimates of the fitness benefits and costs
associated with the remittance, the genetic relatedness of the migrant to the
beneficiaries of the transfer, and their age- and sex-specific reproductive
values, we estimate the level of remittance that maximizes the migrant worker's
inclusive fitness. This is a much better predictor of observed remittances
than is average relatedness, even when we take account (by means of a multiple
regression) of covarying influences on the level of remittance. But the effect
is modest: less than a third of the observed level of remittances can be
explained by our kin-altruism model.
Two points seem worth making here. (Actually, three, but I only have
energy for two.)
1. Obviously, the precise results are going to depend on exactly how various
aspects of the model are specified. (For instance, Bowles and Posel assume
that money makes only a logarithmically-growing contribution to fitness.)
However, they report that the results are at least reasonably robust to changes
in the specification and assumptions, so there really doesn't seem to be any
way to get inclusive fitness effects to account for all or even most of the
remittances.
2. In calculating the inclusive fitness contributions of relatives of
differing ages, they take into account the over-all growth rate of the South
African population. In fact, however, "remittances are slightly better
predicted using reproductive values assuming zero population growth (which was
approximately the case in the ancestral populations of the migrants studied
here)", and this "is consistent with the view that contemporary behaviour may
be an adaptation to past conditions", rather than to present ones.
The Natural Science of the Human Species
Posted at March 23, 2005 17:47 | permanent link