Friday Cat Blogging (A Most Distressing Issue of Science Geek Edition)
This is not good, in several ways:
- Roongroje Thanawongnuwech, Alongkorn Amonsin, Rachod Tantilertcharoen,
Sudarat Damrongwatanapokin, Apiradee Theamboonlers, Sunchai Payungporn,
Kamonchart Nanthapornphiphat, Somchuan Ratanamungklanon, Eakchai Tunak,
Thaweesak Songserm, Veravit Vivatthanavanich, Thawat Lekdumrongsak, Sawang
Kesdangsakonwut, Schwann Tunhikorn, and Yong Poovorawan, "Probable
Tiger-to-Tiger Transmission of Avian Influenza H5N1". Emerging
Infectious Diseases, May 2005.
- During the second outbreak of avian influenza H5N1 in Thailand, probable
horizontal transmission among tigers was demonstrated in the tiger
zoo. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of those viruses showed no
differences from the first isolate obtained in January 2004. This finding has
implications for influenza virus epidemiology and pathogenicity in
mammals.
In addition to the deaths of well over a hundred tigers (unpleasant ones; I
will spare you the details), this is bad because they Thanawongnuwech et
al. can more or less show that many of the tigers which got the disease must
have gotten it from other tigers: "Epidemiologic data obtained from this study
demonstrated that all tigers that became ill after October 23, 2004, were
probably infected by horizontal transmission since the animals had not been fed
raw chicken carcasses since October 16." Infection from other birds can also
be pretty much ruled out. It's worth reading in detail if you want to scare
yourself about mammal-to-mammal transmission of avian flu, or you're curious
about how, exactly, one determines what ails a tiger. (Via Majikthise.)
Friday Cat
Blogging
Posted at April 29, 2005 16:40 | permanent link