Your City's a Sucker, My City's a Creep
I'll let the abstract speak for me on this one:
- CRS, "Scaling and Hierarchy in Urban Economies", submitted to the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(USA), arxiv:1102.4101
- Abstract: In several recent publications, Bettencourt, West and
collaborators claim that properties of cities such as gross economic
production, personal income, numbers of patents filed, number of crimes
committed, etc., show super-linear power-scaling with total population, while
measures of resource use show sub-linear power-law scaling. Re-analysis of the
gross economic production and personal income for cities in the United States,
however, shows that the data cannot distinguish between power laws and other
functional forms, including logarithmic growth, and that size predicts
relatively little of the variation between cities. The striking appearance of
scaling in previous work is largely artifact of using extensive quantities
(city-wide totals) rather than intensive ones (per-capita rates). The remaining
dependence of productivity on city size is explained by concentration of
specialist service industries, with high value-added per worker, in larger
cities, in accordance with the long-standing economic notion of the "hierarchy
of central places".
Figures and calculations were done with
this code and
data. I realize that's
not fully
up to spec for reproducible computational science, but I'm getting there.
(Yes, this the paper which I started because readers kept asking me
questions, and yes, A Fermi Problem in Western
Pennsylvania was spun off from the first draft, which was going to be just
a blog post. It turns out that the journal is OK with putting submitted
manuscripts on arxiv, or at least not too upset.)
Manual trackback: Metadatta;
Chris Waggoner
Self-Centered;
Enigmas of Chance;
The Dismal Science
Posted at February 22, 2011 00:05 | permanent link