Books to Read While the Algae Grow in Your Fur, January 2009
- Charles Tilly, Trust and Rule
- Tilly's principal book on "trust networks", how they sustain themselves or
fail to do so, and how they relate to states and other forms of political
power. Trust networks "consists of ramified interpersonal connections,
consisting mainly of strong ties, within which people set valued,
consequential, long-term resources and enterprises at risk to the malfeasance,
mistakes, or failures of others" (p. 12). This defines trust as
a relationship, one of exposing oneself to serious risk through
another's malice or mistakes, a definition which is pointedly silent about
the feelings accompanying the relationship. I think this nails it.
- Tilly goes on (p. 13, italics his):
Most networks support little or no trust. We will sometimes
recognize segments of networks that qualify as trust-connected
cliques. But the networks of drug use, blood distribution, and sexual contact
through which HIV spreads, the networks through which routine political
information flows, and the networks established by shared membership in
voluntary associations mostly do not qualify. More generally, single-stranded
networks containing few triads and sustaining little intimacy among their nodes
rarely or never become trust networks.
Characteristic enterprises in which trust networks figure importantly
include cohabitation, procreation, provision for children, transmission of
property, communication with supernatural forces, joint control of agricultural
resources, long-distance trade, protection from [human] predators, maintenance
of health, and collective response to disaster. With marked variation from
setting to setting, trust networks often take the forms of religious sects and
solidarities, lineages, trade diasporas, patron-client chains, credit networks,
mutual aid societies, age grades, and local communities.
- This is all very good, and I also like that Tilly does not romanticize
trust networks, being explicit that terrorist cells, pirates, Russian mobsters,
etc., all qualify, and that (as these examples suggest) the risky undertaking
enabled by a trust network can be preying on others. Even without that:
"Powerful figures within trust networks sometimes tyrannize their members:
instill strange beliefs in them, put them through painful initiations, force
youngsters into distasteful careers, require shows of respect for unworthy
elders, murder young women who challenge their sexual or marital
prescriptions. By no means does membership in a trust network guarantee
happiness, much less freedom." Still, he convinces the reader, or at least me,
that trust networks are enduring and important parts of society. He also
offers some intriguing generalizations, like the one about the importance of
triads in the network graph. (I think, but I don't recall him ever quite
saying this explicitly, this is because triads make monitoring and
reputation possible.) There are, as usual, many excellently-presented
historical cases, spanning the globe and the centuries.
- Nonetheless, I find myself less than fully satisfied. (1) Nobody except
Tilly talks about "trust networks", at least not in this sense, and we rarely
have historical cases where we can identify them with any precision. So there
is a lot of guesswork here. (2) Tilly's stories about the kinds of mechanisms
at work sound plausible, as usual, but I despair of ever being able to test
them. (3) He offers no guidance about when we should expect different
mechanisms to be engaged. Perhaps, to be fair, no guidance can be
offered at this level --- perhaps it always depends on high-precision
historical details. (More minorly: [4], Tilly sometimes, as on p. 81, insists
that the ties linking members of a trust network must be a relationship for
which the participants have a name: why? I don't even think all his examples
meet this criterion. [5] This already-brief book would have been ever shorter
if he didn't repeat his definitions of terms over and over.) I can't help but
think that Tilly's dislike
of game
theory may have been a liability.
- It's interesting to think about science in terms of trust networks.
Scientific collaboration is placing "valued, consequential, long-term
resources and enterprises" --- viz., the scientist's reputation and career
--- "at risk to the malfeasance, mistakes, or failures" of the scientist's
collaborators. Might this go some way towards explaining features of
scientific collaboration
networks, like the very high density of triads, and persistent
collaborative cliques? As for "strange beliefs",
"painful initiations", "distasteful careers", and "deference to unworthy
elders" (but fortunately not murder), the jokes draw themselves. §
- Dave Lapham, Silverfish
- Mind candy. Noir crime-fiction in comic-book form, with teenage
protagonists. Well-told and well-drawn. §
- Lois McMaster Bujold, The Sharing Knife, vol. 3, Passage
- Mathukumalli
Vidyasagar, Learning and
Generalization: With Applications to Neural Networks
- A very nice textbook on
statistical learning theory (a
la Vapnik) which, properly, treats it
as a branch or extension of empirical process theory, and
emphasizes function learning (instead of just classifier learning). Among the
many nice features here is the recognition that data in the real world are
dependent, and a discussion of conditions under which learning
procedures designed for independent data will still work with dependent data,
albeit with an efficiency penalty reflecting how quickly correlations decay.
(Beta-mixing, for example, is sufficient but not necessary; an interesting open
question is what the necessary and sufficient conditions on a mixing process
are for probably-approximately-correct learning to remain possible.)
Vidyasagar is also good at building connections to computational
learning theory, which introduces considerations of time- and sample-
complexity.
- No prior knowledge of learning theory or even of measure-theoretic
probability is required; all the necessary mathematical material is built here.
Basic mathematical maturity, of the kind one would expect from graduate
students in statistics, computer science, electrical engineering, physics,
economics, etc., is essential.
- The last two chapters consider, respectively, neural networks and problems
in control theory. (Despite the back-cover blurb, support vector machines are
discussed on only one page.) The neural network chapter is fairly
self-contained, but the control chapter will be largely incomprehensible to
those without previous exposure to the subject. This is a shame, since it
contains about randomized algorithms for probably-approximately-correct
solutions to intractable problems, and about systems identification, which
would be of interest to readers whose eyes will glaze over (to say the least)
at the sight of transfers functions. This is, however, at most a minor
flaw.
- If I were teaching a class on statistical learning theory, I
would definitely consider using this book. §
- (Thanks to Dr. Vidyasagar for some interesting correspondence, which
prompted me to read his book.)
- James
K. Galbraith, The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free
Market and Why Liberals Should Too
- I really have nothing to important to add to Aaron
Swartz's summary;
other than to say read this book. (I am buying copies for friends and
relatives.)
- (On an un-important note, I think it's inevitable it is unfair but
inevitable to compare this J. K. Galbraith writing about economics and public
purposes to the other one, who happens to have been his father. [Or it's at
least inevitable that I'd make the comparison, since the elder
Galbraith is one of my heroes.] This book is in some ways an act of filial
piety, losing few opportunities to point out places where the senior Galbraith
has been vindicated by events. More broadly, its great theme is the collapse
of what JKG I called "countervailing power", the thing which made American
capitalism tolerable and even progressive --- or, more exactly, the
deliberate destruction of such countervailing power. For the most part this
Galbraith avoids his father's style, --- smooth as silk, and as hard to
produce --- in favor of more workmanlike prose; there are a few places, but
only a few, where he is positively infelicitous, in ways his father would never
have allowed into print.) §
- Dan
Simmons, The
Terror
- Historical horror fiction, based on the Franklin expedition in search of
the northwest passage of the 1840s. Some recurring Simmons themes (e.g., the
characters with the unlikely fondness for classical Greek
(who he should not have had discuss natural
selection; I can't decide whether this is a greater offense against historical
plausibility or against sheer narrative flow), and the contrast between
adapted indigenous cultures (here, the "Esqimaux") and blundering, greedy,
self-defeating westerners, though he doesn't hit the reader over the head with
that last quite as bluntly as in his
master-work Hyperion. (Oddly, non-western high
civilizations come off very poorly in Simmons's fiction, as in the brilliant
and terrifying yet borderline-racist Song of Kali.)
Creepy and intensely compelling. §
- Steven Johnson, The Invention of Air: A History of Science, Faith,
Revolution, and the Birth of America
- Popular biography
of Joseph
Priestley. Johnson tries hard to keep in view both Priestley's individual
biography and the larger networks and movements he participated in, so in part
this is a bit of a ramble through the 18th century English-speaking house of
intellect, which is not a bad thing.
- There is, as the subtitle indicates, special emphasis --- more than
perhaps is truly warranted --- on his American connections. This is
because the book is very much an attempt by Johnson to claim Priestly as part
of a usable American past of Enlightenment progressivism, in which there is no
tension between rational religion and scientific advance. There is nothing
wrong with this --- quite the reverse; this is a part of our
national traditions, and we should emphasize it --- but at the same time it
leads Johnson into some choices in his writing which feel like they make this
book more transient than it needed to be.
- Annoyances: (1) the formulaic opening scene. (2) the idea that the
physiological effects of coffee sparked the Age of Reason was something
I tossed off as a joke, complete with counter-examples,
several years ago. I am displeased to see this same conceit here (pp. 54ff),
being taken seriously not just by Johnson but evidently by others --- not,
to be clear, because I think I deserve credit (I'm sure it's not original), but
because it is stupid. §
- Errata: p. 20, for "1850s" read "1750s"; p. 22, for "mid-seventeenth" read "mid-eighteenth".
- H. P. Lovecraft, The Tomb, and Other Tales
- Someone has already expressed my
sentiments in
lolcat form. (To say the
least, Red Hook's
changed.) But despite that there is a certain power to the stories. §
- Jeffrey Alford and Naomi
Duguid, Mangoes and Curry Leaves: Culinary Travels through the
Great Subcontinent
- Very good recipes and nice travel writing, plus lickable-looking
photographs. §
- Hiroshi
Kondo, The Book of Saké (a.k.a. Saké: A
Drinker's Guide)
- Social history, lore and etiquette, a lovingly geeky description of the
fermentation process (complete with graphs!), and specific recommendations.
(Many thanks to K. for the gift, and for
the Yuki no Bosha
junmai ginjo.) §
Books to Read While the Algae Grow in Your Fur;
Scientifiction and Fantastica;
The Progressive Forces;
Networks;
The Dismal Science;
Enigmas of Chance;
Writing for Antiquity;
The Great Transformation;
Food;
The Running Dogs of Reaction;
The Beloved Republic
Posted at January 31, 2009 23:59 | permanent link