Books to Read While the Algae Grow in Your Fur, March 2012
Attention conservation notice: I have no taste.
- Elizabeth
Bear, Range of Ghosts
- Suppose that a very good fantasy novelist — someone who gets
the attraction of heroic fantasy at a bone-deep level, and has a core a
conviction that everything valuable involves a painful sacrifice (with luck,
only proportionately painful) — decided to dig back to, or
through, the roots of the genre in writers like Tolkien, Howard and Leiber.
Suppose then that she also took inspiration from the medieval history of
Central Asia, and especially from books
like Grosset
and The Tibetan
Empire in Central Asia
and Beckwith.
We might then find ourselves with a fantasy trilogy opening with a war between
the sons and the grandsons of the Great Khagan for
dominion over the empire of the steppes. If we are fortunate (and we are),
this will go on with: shamanistic sorcerers trained in isolated mountain
kingdoms; hungry ghosts; butterflies of ill omen; the peculiar beauty of
fertile valleys in the high desert and their towns; rocs and their
taming; Baluchitherium; death
cults building their fortresses on desert mesas; bipedal tiger-demons;
haunted kurgans; lunar yet vivid landscapes; necromancers drawing all the
peoples of the world into war; hair-breadth escapes; painful wounds; plausible
dynastic politics; wrenching choices; remarkable horses; yurts; heroes who have
learned "to speak the truth and to handle bow and arrow well"; many very
different big skies;
polyandry; colored
salt from the roof of the world; a
Song monk wandering the
western lands on a mysterious errand; and (spoiler follows) n phefrq evat
bs tbyq juvpu gheaf vgf jrnere vaivfvoyr.
- I realize that some of the buttons this pushes for me are rather arcane,
but honestly it has been years since I read a novel in this genre with the same
enjoyment and the same "but how does it the story go on?" feeling at
the end.
- (More spoilers: V guvax gur Pneevba Xvat vf zber be yrff Na Yhfuna/Ebuxfuna, juvyr Qhancngv vf Nggvyn, ohg V nz ernyyl abg fher nobhg rvgure vqragvsvpngvba, naq vg'f n avpr dhrfgvba jung rvgure jbhyq zrna. Naq: Grzhe, lbh gjb-gvzvat pnq.)
- Author's self-presentations: 1, 2, 3
- Orhan Pamuk, My Name Is Red
- A re-read; fortunately I'd forgotten the solution to the murder mystery,
which of course is not the point. The point is rather: art, memory, ambition,
longing, melancholy, transience, eternity, tradition, style, individuality,
imperfection, perspective, vision, blindness. And then of course there are the
games following from a novel about the Ottoman heirs of
the Old Masters of
Herat trying to learn the methods of the "Frankish and Venetian masters",
being written by a Turk who has obviously mastered the methods of masters like
Calvino. (It is not clear to me if the story-within-a-story technique is
really a nod to the 1001 Nights, or rather to The Castle of
Crossed Destinies and Invisible Cities.)
- I rather disliked the first book of
Pamuk's I read, but this is wonderful, and you should go read it if you
haven't.
- Ideally, however, there would be an illuminated edition.
- (The one thing I would change, and I
realize this is petty so I put it in the end in small type, is the disquisition
about the meaning of oral sex, which is not at all indecent but
just inadvertently funny, like the worst bits of Updike.)
- Clark Ashton
Smith, Zothique
- Mind candy. Smith was a talented early fantasy writer, overlapping with
science fiction and horror, of the same vintage as Lovecraft, largely
remembered, nowadays, as the latter's friend. This is a bit unfair. Smith
didn't have the same power of vision that Lovecraft did, but he was a much
better story-teller, and an actually-good stylist. (Smith was also much more
pervy and directly influenced by turn-of-the-century decadence, which may be a
feature or a bug, depending.) Zothique is a collection, edited by
Lin Carter, of Smith's fantasy stories set in the far future, named after
Earth's last continent, when the sun has dimmed and weird magics haunt a world
full of ruins. If they weren't a direct inspiration for Vance's The
Dying Earth (and so much
else), I will spend a night
reciting "The
Empire of the Necromancers" in a Pittsburgh cemetery. This are good
stories of their kind (ObDisclaimer: casually racist and misogynist author was
casually racist and misogynist), but the truth is, Vance was
just better.
- This particular anthology is long out of print, but his complete
stories are online.
- I see that I bought my copy
from Moe's Books in Berkeley on 23 April
1993; I am indeed a sloth.
- Martha Wells, The Cloud Roads and The Serpent Sea
- Mind candy, but, like all of Wells's books, very high quality mind candy.
These are romances of caste and ecology among the social lizards. (More
exactly, shape-shifting social lizard-men, who mercifully owe nothing
to Anunnaki
mythology.) I gather that there will be a third book in the series in
2013.
- ObLinkage: Author's self-presentation for The Cloud Roads
- — Sequel, apparently concluding
the series.
- Marius Iosifescu and Serban Grigorescu, Dependence with Complete Connections and Its Applications
- Full-length review: Memories Fading to Infinity
- — I used to joke that my nightmares included giving a talk and having
an member of the audience announce at the end, in a thick Eastern European
accent, that everything I'd said was a special case of a theorem his adviser
had published in the Proceedings of the Academy of Agro-Technical
Sciences of Outer Yajanistan in 1962. (I am under no illusions about
being funny.) Reading Dependence with Complete Connections is a
bit like wandering into that joke. I have been dealing with chains with
complete connections since
my first paper, though for
most of the time I didn't realize that's what they were. I can salve my pride
by saying that the problems I'm interested in (e.g.: given a stochastic
process find the smallest
random system with complete connections which generates it, for a particular
value of "small") are not the ones solved by the old masters of Bucharest.
But when I think of all the times I've said "they're like HMMs, only not
exactly", I feel very low.
- Tony Judt with Timothy Snyder, Thinking the Twentieth Century
- Partly Judt's autobiography, partly Judt and Snyder conversing about the
intellectual history of the twentieth century, intellectuals in politics, and
about how intellectuals ought to behave, and just how far that has
been from our actual conduct. At least as presented here, Snyder's main contribution
to the book was making it possible at all
— a
truly moving story, so I will just refer to Thinking the Twentieth
Century as Judt's.
- Little in this book will surprise those who have read Judt's previous
books, especially Postwar and Reappraisals,
but this is rather more concentrated and systematic than his other works, and
perhaps more accessible than the vast Postwar. As I've said
before, I find a lot of Judt's views sympathetic and generally well-argued, and
his prescriptive ideas very attractive. I'm glad we have this.
- But, following a proud tradition, I am going to mostly quibble with a minor
point, or rather some absences. It was very striking this time just
how Eurocentric and literary-ideological Judt's perspective on intellectual
life was. Intellectuals are authors from Europe or North America who write on
politics, morals, or the arts. Anything about the natural world, technology,
or math is right out. (There is a partial exception as to math in favor of
economists, but even then the only two treated at length, or even I think by
name, are Keynes and Hayek, who are, of course, unusually non-mathematical
economists. [Actually, the discussion of how Hayek's road-to-serfdom ideas
relate to Austrian politics in the '30s is very interesting.]) The image of a
Central European thinker with massive influence from the middle of the 20th
century onwards
is Martin
Heidegger*, not John
von Neumann; the image of an intellectual in politics
in Léon Blum, not
Jawaharlal Nehru.
(Even if one only cares about intellectuals as ideologists, von Neumann has a
lot of claim to our attention.) It is not at all obvious that this is the best
way to look at the century which saw the dissolution of the European empires,
or the enterprise of science and technology assuming such vast size and
consequence. One could defend these choices of perspectives
as selections ("I am interested in this corner of the whole
panorama of human intellectual life") or as judgments ("this is the
most important history, for such-and-such reasons"), but I don't think
Judt (or Snyder) realizes that they are choices.
- (I will say nothing about Judt's pronouncements on
American feminism in the last chapter, out of respect for his
memory.)
- *: In saying this, I don't mean for a moment to suggest that Judt agrees with Heidegger about, well, anything.
- D. R. Cox and Christl A. Donnelly, Principles of Applied Statistics
- Full-length review, originally
in American Scientist.
- Shorter me: There are two great traditions of applied statistics. One is
what we now call "data mining" or (distastefully) "data science". The other is
aims at solving scientific problems, and is what Cox has been contributing to
for longer than most working statisticians have been alive. Short of
apprenticing oneself to a master of the art for a few years, there is no better
introduction to how one translates between scientific questions and statistical
problems.
- Nota bene, D. R. Cox, the eminent
real-world statistician, is not to be confused with
the fictional Dr. Cox,
despite what some search engines might suggest. Indeed, so far as I know, no
one has ever suggested that the actual Prof. Cox is a "bastard-coated bastard
with bastard filling".
- Amanda Downum, The Kingdoms of Dust
- Mind candy. Suppose that
Lovecraft's "Colour
out of Space" had been what happened
to Iram, City of
Pillars — what then? (Previous adventures of our
heroine.)
- Jack
Knight and James
Johnson, The
Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism
- Full-length review: Dissent is the Health of the Democratic State
- Shorter me: This is actually a very deep book about democracy, and why,
exactly, it is so awesome, but it's written so obscurely it will have no
impact, which is a shame.
- Seanan
McGuire, Discount
Armageddon
- Mind candy. Between the community of monsters living among us in the big
city, the generations-old organization dealing with same, the heroine's day-job
as a scantily-clad waitress at a dubiously-themed bar, and (most of all) the
chapter headings, if this isn't descended from (high
quality) Middleman
fanfic, there's been a lot of lateral genetic transfer. This, to be
clear, is a good thing.
- ObLinkage: Author's self-presentation.
- Lauren Willig, The Garden Intrigue
- Mind candy. By this point my
commitment to the series and characters is slightly disturbing.
- Franklin E. Zimring, The Great American Crime Decline
- A nicely written summary of the established facts about the huge and
enduring decline in crime in America during the 1990s, as well as just how
little we understand about its causes. (Zimring has some malicious, but
entirely justified, fun at the expense of those who, in the early and even mid
1990s, confidently predicted a massive crime surge*.) The "usual suspects" ---
demographics, unemployment, and locking people up** --- all pointed towards a
decline in the crime rate, but nobody, before it happened, would have been able
to predict the massive scale of the decline. Even retrospectively, it is hard
to make these account for more than about half of the decline***. Causal theories
advanced after the decline had become obvious have obvious selection-bias
problems, and when one tries to cross-check them by looking at what they would
imply for phenomena other than national crime totals, the results are not
happy****. (I am a little surprised that no one has tried to argue for the
benevolent influences of e-mail, first-person shooters and hypertext.) Going
over these facts and the evidence for and against putative causes involves a
lot of examination of data and methodological criticism, but Zimring is good at
conveying this clearly.
- Zimring puts a lot of stress on two aspects of the crime decline. First,
crime rates fell much more in New York city than in the rest of the country ---
roughly twice as much. Something had to be very different about
New York, even compared to other large cities in the US. What is still
stranger is that, as Zimring says, in many ways New York was much the same city
in 2000 has it had been in 1990, when it had several times as much serious
and violent crime — there had been no vast social or moral change.
- Second, and I find these even more interesting than the stuff about New
York, the crime decline in the US was paralleled by a crime decline in Canada
of similar timing and magnitude — but not in other developed
countries. Yet Canada had no massive surge of incarceration, no huge expansion
of policing, not even the same sort of economic boom in the 1990s... In fact,
the most astonishing thing for me in the whole book is Figure 5.23 on p. 132,
showing US and Canadian murder rates tracking each other with eerie precision
from 1961 to 2002. Unless this is the consequence of a massive exercise in
juking the stats, no explanation which focuses on causes only working
in either country can be very plausible.
- The Great American Crime Decline was published in 2006. I'd
love to read an update, but even so I learned a great deal from it, and recommend it.
- (Thanks to M. R. for telling me about this book and lending me her
copy.)
- *: Considering the prominent place in this
scare-mongering of scholars like James Q. Wilson and John "Super-predators"
DiIulio, there is an interesting essay to be written about
the selective skepticism of conservatives and neo-conservatives
towards social science forecasting.
- **: Except, of course, for the crimes those in prison perpetrate on
each other, as they notoriously do.
- ***: The major demographic variable here is the number of adolescents and
young adults, especially the number of teenage boys and young men. As Zimring
nicely puts it, however, the fact that young males are always
disproportionately likely to be criminals doesn't help us predict the number of
crimes from the number of young males. To do that, we would have to know not
just the crime rates among different demographic groups, but also be able
to extrapolate those rates into the future. If anyone has figured out how
to do that, they're not telling.
- ***: Zimring also has some nice, tart examples
here of "the cross-sterilization of the social sciences" (a phrase he
attributes to an unnamed judge), especially when it comes to economists —
i.e., Steve "Freakonomics" Levitt — writing about crime and
demographics.
Books to Read While the Algae Grow in Your Fur;
Scientifiction and Fantastica;
Enigmas of Chance;
The Progressive Forces
Central Asia;
The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts;
The Commonwealth of Letters;
Writing for Antiquity;
Commit a Social Science;
Pleasures of Detection, Portraits of Crime
Posted at March 31, 2012 23:59 | permanent link